John (Nagrath),
Make sure you are using a chlorine test that does not get bleached out -- a FAS-DPD test is best, but even an OTO test would tell you that the problem isn't the chlorine test. If the test is accurate, then get an inexpensive ammonia test kit from a fish/pet/aquarium store and see if you have ammonia in the pool. If you do, then it will take at least 8x the ammonia amount in chlorine to get rid of -- possibly more (due to intermediate products). You can do a bucket test to see how much chlorine it will take (by scaling appropriately).
It would be strange to have ammonia in the pool if you indeed had no CYA in the pool at all. Note that if you ever used stabilized chlorine (Trichlor pucks/tabs or granules, Dichlor powder) then your pool does have CYA in it. You refer to running the chlorinator full open and usually a "chlorinator" is a Trichlor puck feeder, probably inline. For every 10 ppm FC added by Trichlor, it also increases CYA by 6 ppm so you could have had a LOT of CYA in the water so could, in fact, had bacteria convert it to ammonia when the FC dropped to zero.
Alan,
Please do not use all caps. It is very hard to read.
As for salt pools, there are plenty of salt pools that get algae -- it is not a panacea for preventing algae growth. Even salt pools with a saltwater chlorine generator (SWG) can get algae if they follow the industry recommended FC of 1-3 ppm with a CYA of 60-80 ppm because at 80 ppm CYA you need a minimum of at least 3.6 ppm for the chlorine to kill algae faster than it can grow and given overnight loss a minimum FC of 4 ppm is better in SWG pools with that CYA level. If you want to add something to your pool in a one-time dose with minimal side effects to inhibit algae growth, then 50 ppm Borates would be a better choice. Copper ions (that you mentioned with a copper-based algaecide) are also a one-time dose and definitely can prevent algae, but the metal ions can also stain.
Salt in the pool doesn't affect what chlorine does. The higher salt levels let your eyes not feel as much pressure because the salinity in the pool is higher and closer to the 9000 ppm of your tears. That's all. If your eyes are opened in water with a low salinity, then water tends to enter into the eye creating pressure. There is no mystery here. However, higher salt levels are also more corrosive so there is no free lunch. You can read about some of the problems in this blog though most people are happy with their SWG pools. If you've got soft hardscape stone or less expensive stainless steel or have aluminum such as in pool covers or have metal diving board bases, etc., then you need to be more careful about the faster corrosion.
Salt does not "ionize the water". It does increase what is called the "ionic strength" and that slightly shifts chemical reactions towards the side that has more charged ions because such ions are somewhat shielded, but that's all and it's not a big deal. It doesn't speed up chemical reactions or make things more powerful. It also does not change the speed at which chlorine breaks down from sunlight or other sources, though obviously Cyanuric Acid does that effect in a huge way.
I do NOT recommend the LaMotte test nor test strips. I recommend the Taylor K-2006 kit which can be obtained at a good online price here or the TF100 from tftestkits.net here. These both have the FAS-DPD chlorine test that can measure both Free Chlorine (FC) and Combined Chlorine (CC) accurately to with 0.2 ppm using a 25 ml sample or 0.5 ppm using a 10 ml sample. Unlike DPD chlorine tests, they do not bleach out and can measure up to 50 ppm. They are far more accurate then DPD or OTO tests and test strips (and if LaMotte had a FAS-DPD chlorine test in their kit, then I'd probably recommend that as well). As for test strips, they do not test for Calcium Hardness (CH) -- they only test Total Hardness which is not relevant for calculating the saturation index used to protect plaster surfaces.
Cyanuric Acid (CYA) does not just protect chlorine from sunlight. Though it does absorb UV from the sun shielding lower depths of water, it mostly combines with chlorine to produce chemical (called chlorinated isocyanurates) that are not effective sanitizers nor oxidizers. CYA significantly lowers chlorine's strength and this is very important to know since the FC/CYA ratio is what roughly determines the amount of active chlorine in the water and the amount of chlorine you need to prevent algae growth. See this post for more info on this.
As for phosphates, you are correct that it is not necessary to remove them in order to prevent algae growth. A sufficient FC level relative to the CYA level will prevent algae from growing. Phosphate removes should be seen in the same vein as algaecides -- something that, at extra cost, can lower the rate of algae growth, but not necessary if sufficient chlorine is used. It's more like insurance. You also bring up the interesting true fact that alum flocs also tend to lower phosphate levels (especially very high phosphate levels) though the lanthanum based products are typically used to lower phosphate levels that have already been lowered to at least 1000 ppb by other means.
Though clearing a pool of ammonia can certainly be done with many different oxidizers, including non-chlorine shock (potassium monopersulfate, MPS), it can also be done much less expensively with chlorine alone. As for CYA getting converted into ammonia by bacteria (when the FC gets to zero allowing the bacteria to grow) I describe that here.
Richard




